Coalition Against Insurance Fraud
Consumers

Fraud measurement survey

In April 2004, 65 attendees of the Insurance Fraud Management conference in Phoenix participated in a conference session that asked them to complete a survey on their companies practices involving how they measure anti-fraud activities involving case referrals, fraud savings and performance evaluations of investigators. The conference session was led by Dennis Toomey of Liberty Mutual, Frank Sztuk of Allmerica Insurance and Dennis Jay of the Coalition Against Insurance Fraud. Below are the results of the survey. Additional analysis of the survey will be available at a later date.

Referrals



1. Do you track the percentage of claims that are referred to SIU?

Yes
  86%
No
  14%


If yes, what was your referral rate for 2003?

Less than 1%
  25%
1% to 3%
  39%
More than 3%, less than 5%
  23%
Greater than 5%
  13%

 

2. How useful would it be to you to compare your referral rate to an industry average?

Very useful
  57%
Somewhat useful
  40%
Not useful at all
  3%

 

3. Would you and your company be willing to share your rates of referral by line of business with the Coalition Against Insurance Fraud on a confidential basis to help develop industry averages?

Yes
  69%
No
  2%
Maybe
  28%

Savings



4. Does your company track the amount of savings incurred as a result of anti-fraud activities?

Yes
  80%
No
  20%


If so . . .

5. What factors are used to calculate savings?

Total claims payout
  25 (number of responses)
Reserves
  36
Actual potential payout
  33
Compromises
  30
Other
  12

 

6. Does any non-SIU department within your company audit or assist in determining the savings amount?

Yes
  48%
No
  52%

 

7. Do you believe that the calculated total is an accurate reflection of real savings your SIU brings to your company?

Yes
  10%
No
  90%

 

8. Do you feel that the aggregate total of savings your company reports to state insurance departments accurately reflects your total anti-fraud efforts?

Yes
  3%
No
  97%


Performance evaluation

9. What are the top three factors that your company uses to measure the performance of individual investigators?

Quality & accuracy of investigations
  59 (number of responses)
Number of investigations
  38
Closing ratio
  24
Average days open
  18
Recovered premium
  1
Averaged paid
  4
Assists
  7
Training
  16
Savings
  11
Other
  9


10. Does your performance system take into consideration complex cases vs. simple ones?

Yes
  56%
No
  44%

 

11. In a case where an urban medical provider submits 100 questionable claims, does your performance system count this as:

One case
  29%
100 cases
  47%
Other
  24%


 

›Back to Top

 
 
About Us | Legislation | Hall of Shame | e-Newsletter | Members Only | Site Index | FraudBlog | En Español